Lukins.com | All Blogs | Lukins & Annis Legal Blog Home

Lukins & Annis Legal Blog

Judicial enforcement provision of Washington Condominium Act preempted by Federal Arbitration Act

In Satomi Owners Association v. Satomi, LLC (2009), the Washington Supreme Court was faced with an important constitutional issue as to whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempts the judicial enforcement provision of the Washington Condominium Act.

The case arose out of the allegedly defective construction of two condo projects in King County. The condominium owner's associations brought construction defect claims under the Washington Condominium Act against the condo developers and contractors.

The developers and contractors argued that such claims had to be arbitrated because of the arbitration clause in the parties' respective contracts and the strong federal policy favoring enforcement of arbitration provisions under the Federal Arbitration Act. The condominium owner's associations argued that construction defect claims were beyond the scope of the contractual arbitration clauses, relying on the express judicial enforcement provision in the Washington Condominium Act.

The Washington Supreme Court wrestled with the apparent conflict between the federal and state laws, and ultimately held that the judicial enforcement provision of the Washington Condominium Act was preempted by federal law. Thus, when there is an arbitration provision in the parties' contract, the proper forum for condo construction defect claims is arbitration, not state court.

However, Satomi Owners Association v. Satomi, LLC does not render the judicial enforcement provision of the Washington Condominium Act completely toothless. Where the parties contract does not contain an arbitration clause, the judicial enforcement provision still applies and condo construction defect claims may be brought in state court.

Satomi Owners Association v. Satomi, LLC ought to be considered in drafting and negotiating any condo construction contract. The decision provides an increased level of certainty in contracting for alternative dispute resolution and a strong signal as to how courts will likely construe the scope of an arbitration clause in the context of condo construction.

 

Our website has been prepared and is maintained by our firm. The materials appearing on this website are for informational purposes to enable you to learn about our firm and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact an attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Access to this site or use of any of the email links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship. The opinions expressed on or through the site are opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.

All copyrightable text and graphics and the overall design and presentation of materials are the property of Lukins & Annis, P.S. Permission is granted to download and print materials from this website for the purpose of viewing, reading, and retaining for reference. Any other copying, distribution, retransmission, or modification of information or materials on this site without the express prior written permission of Lukins & Annis, P.S., is strictly prohibited.